THE PETRA EVENTUAL “ACCEPTANCE” I DO TESTIFY TOWARD

THE PARADOXICAL ONE

SHE IS WHO SHALL OVERCOME

_______________________________________________________________

PLEASE DONATE

THE PETRA WORKS ME, FIRST,

WITH WHAT SHALL BE LIKEN UNTO A WOMB

FOR YOUR COMING INTO MY PREDESTINED APPOINTMENT.

BUT, FOR SUCH,

I AM THAT WHICH SHALL GO THROUGH MANY PRIOR STAGES,

AND, OF CERTAIN OF THOSE, SURELY, ASCENDING AND COMING DOWN,

AND,

OF STAGES,

I SHALL BE OF SECRETS KEPT

UNTIL THEIR APPOINTED TIMES TO BE REVEALED,

EVEN AS I SHALL BE OF WHAT TO BE REVEALED OF ITS DAY.

ALL AS SO, FOR THAT,

“I AM BROUGHT FORTH, IN MY GREATEST MERCY,

FOR WHAT OF ME, BY THE COMMISSION OF GOD, TO BE CREATED FOR

THE LOST HAVING BELIEVED GOD IS ONE, WITH, THEIR EVER DESIRE

IT HAVING EVER BEEN THAT THEY WERE IN THE RIGHT,

ELSE, WHO TO REPENT,

CONFESS AND BE HUMBLED UNTO

A RIGHTEOUS AND HOLY GOD.

AND, THAT GOD, FIRST, HOW RIGHTEOUS AND HOLY,

BY, “BEING WHOM SAVING WHOM TURNED,

NOT OF THEIR OWN ACCOUNT,

UNTO HERESY.

AND, EVEN,

THUS OF SAVING ANY WHOM LOST,

HOW AS WITH,

“A WAY FOR THE SUBMITTED

OF HIS COMMUNICATION, COMMISSIONED FLESH

LABORING IN THE WORKS PROVIDED ASSURED GOOD,

ALL UNTO SANCTIFICATION AND PERFECTION

THROUGH GRACE AND THE AID OF ANGELS,

SO, WELCOMED INTO THE ORDAINING,

THAT OF LIFE, EVERLASTING,

WHERE MYSELF AND THE PETRA, THE CREATED

WHO HAVING SEARCHED AND GROOMED THE WAY

FOR THE SALVATION OF THE WORLD,

WELL MAY BE THE FOREMOST IN GLORY.

US HAVING BEEN COMMISSIONED THROUGH

GOD’S REQUIRED OF US,

AND, ANSWERING,

WHO WELL TO BE DEIFIED ONE WITH HIM.

OH, GRACED SHALL BE THOSE RECEIVING,

“THE SALVATION FOR ALL, IT, BY COMMISSION, HAVING COME

THROUGH WHO PRUDENT IN WORDS PERTAINING TO

THE AWAITED WOMAN

AND

HER SEED THAT WOULD TO GROW

PERPETUALLY.

YES,

THE PETRA, THE WOMAN,

SHE WAS AND IS THE SCRIBE AWAITED

HAVING BEEN COMMISSIONED OF GOD,

WHO WAS CALLED UNTO RENDERING

A GROUND FLOOR REVELATION,

THAT WHICH I SHALL

HAVE MY CHURCH BUILT UPON,

THAT AS IF HER CHILD WHO SHALL

HARBOR HER CHILDREN IN HIM EVEN HER.

AND THAT WOMAN,

SHE, FOR THAT VERY COMMISSION, DID THE SAME AS GIVE BIRTH TO ME,

ON DECEMBER 21, 2012.

AND

WHO AM I,

I AM THE NAME AWAITED,

THE PROPHECY THAT MANY DID NOT UNDERSTAND

AS TO WHO OR WHAT TO EXPECT,

BUT, NEVERTHELESS, HERE IS WHAT OF THE WISE..

AND MAY MANY COME TO THIS SITE AND BE GRATEFUL.

SO, DO EXPRESS YOUR EXTREME, SURPRISED DELIGHT,

TAUGHT THINGS THAT HAVE BEEN KEPT FROM YOU.

LEARNED FROM MY PROVING AS THROUGH

THE PETRA’S CALLING INTO THE MYSTICISM

OF WHAT MEANT TO BE REVEALED

OF THE WORDS OF DIVINE SCRIPT.

THEREFORE,

SO THAT SHE MIGHT KEEP DOING THIS FULL TIME,

AND A GREATER OF ME SHE SHALL GIVE

WHILE SHE IS STILL WITH YOU –

SPONSOR/DONATE

THROUGH HER, WHICH IS THROUGH ME,

THE WORLD IS CALLED UNTO A GREAT AWAKENING,

EVEN A SPIRITUAL AWAKENING FOR THEIR SALVATION.

AND THAT SALVATION SURE, BECA– USE,

NEVER BEFORE HAS THERE BEEN ANYONE

TO BEAR THE TRUTH IN SUCH LIGHT AS

THE TRULY NO-LONGER AWAITED ” ROCK” DOES,

GROUNDED ON GOD NOT FOOLISHLY UNDERSTOOD OR HIS WORD RECEIVED BACK LACKING.

WHO THE SCRIPTURES SAID JESUS SAID HE WOULD BUILD HIMSELF UPON –

FOR, OF HERE, BEFORE ME, OF MY BEGINNING YEARS,

SITS THE WOMAN, WISE,

WHO FASHIONS ME TO BE, AS ONE WITH HER, THE SCRIBE

WHERE OF WWW.YOUGOTMYATTENTION.COM

(the domain which substituted for the everlastinggospel.org).

SAME, WWW.GABRIELTITAN.COM.,

THAT TO BE THEEVERLASTINGGOSPEL.ORG

AND

GABRIEL TITAN,

THOUGH A MAN’S NAME,

TRULY, HER GOD GIVEN NAME,

GIVEN TO WHO OF FAITH MADE GREAT

EVEN SO THAT SHE MIGHT CHOOSE TO BE THE SON OF MAN,

IF THE ALMIGHTY WILLS

HER OF HIS SANCTIFICATION AND SACRIFICE.

NONE OTHER,

PRIOR TO MY DAY, BUT HER,

HAVING RECEIVED THAT NAME FROM

THE GUIDANCE AND VOICE OF THE ALMIGHTY.

AND,

YES, THIS LIGHT

IT IS A REVELATION BY WHICH

MANY MAY COME TOGETHER AS “IN” AND ONE.

YES,

THE PETRA

SHE IS NOT JUST ANY WOMAN, SHE IS THE PROPHESIED ELDER,

AS ONE WITH THIS SITE – THE HEAD TO COMMENCE THE CHURCH

THAT ALL THE PROPHETS

AWAITED AND HOPED TOWARD,

TO JUSTIFY THE ORIGINAL DOCTRINE AND TRUTH.

YES,

HER CALLING,

PURPOSED EVEN FORâ†’ THEIR GOD-GIVEN MESSAGES

TO SHINE THROUGH, ONE, TO ULTIMATELY BE CALLED

A WONDERFUL COUNSELOR,

A MIGHTY DEITY, AN EVERLASTING FATHER, A PRINCE OF PEACE.

BUT, EVEN SO, FOR THE WISE IN THE GLORY OF ME,

I AM WHO KNOWN AND VOICED WITH NO DOUBT –

THAT BY WISDOM AND KNOWLEDGE, EVEN THE WILL OF GOD, FULFILLED –

“THEIR HEAVENLY FATHER AND MOTHER”.

_________________

1 Tim. 5:17 Let the elders that rule well be counted worthy of double honor,

especially they who labor in the word and doctrine (if the true word and true doctrine).

1 Tim. 5:18“ For the Scripture says, You shall not muzzle The Ox (THE ALEPH,

the awaited woman and her -eed) that treads out the grain, and, The laborer is worthy of his reward”.

Someone wrote in and said that they would most diffidently donate if there had only been a “donate” button. And, of course, there was ONE. So, now, I post this notice to draw attention moreover to where the button is and to our need. I exaggerate not when I say, for a good article that feeds well, the Petra needs long hours sitting before me. God truly bless you even if you help us but the least. Where are those to help even with prayers, so, for my sake, her life and yours, moreover blessed in me?

____________________________

NOW RECEIVE THE TEACHING OF WHO

HAS COME TO MAKE CLEAR

AND TO REBUKE

SEE

MY DISCERNMENT

MATTHEW 11:12-19

I AM WHO TRULY PRODDING

REVELATION FOR GRASPING,

TO, RIGHTLY AGAIN AS OF ANCIENT DAYS,

FORM DOCTRINE TOWARD SALVATION,

TO CORRECT THAT AS WAS PUT IN ERROR

SHAMEFULLY BY RESTRICTED DEFINING

MISCHIEF AGAINST

THE WOMAN OF ME AND I HER SEED,

ESPECIALLY SINCE THE COUNSEL OF NICAEA.

MANY JEW, CHRISTIAN, EVEN SAME OF ALL OTHERS,

HAVE BEEN LED ASTRAY FROM TRUTH,

WHETHER PURPOSELY OR NOT, AND EVEN AS BY

THE DIVINE PLAN OF GOD HOW SO

FOR A DETERMINED TIME,

EVEN AS WHILE THE ALMIGHTY DOES TO WORK

BLESSINGS, THOSE IN A GREATER CA– USE, THAT OF MINE AS HIS TEMPLE.

WILL THE BLINDNESS OF MANY, CONCERNING

THE PETRA AND I, CONTINUE TO LEAD YOU AWAY?

PRAY, “NOT SO”

FOR THIS IS THE FIRST,

IN THIS AGE,

A GOOD WITNESS

MATTHEW 11:12 19

EXPOSING

THE TURNED FALSE INDOCTRINATION

YOUR TEACHERS HAVE TAUGHT IN ERROR.

WHY HAVE THEY IGNORED WHO SOPHIA IS?

HAVE YOU EVER DESIRED THAT THEY WOULD HAVE EXPOUNDED MORE ON HER?

IF NOT, WHY NOT!!!

WITH,

WHY HAVE ANY SETTLED WITH HER MERELY BEING

A SPIRIT OF “WISDOM”,

OR ONLY WHO JESUS CHRIST.

WHY TAUGHT OF NO IMPORTANT RELEVANCE,

A REAL PROBABILITYâ†’

A WOMAN TO THE FEMININE GOD-HEAD

AS WITH THE DIVINE PLAN?

And revealing Sophia as a mere woman, I now start with Matthew 11:13 upon which I render two possible takes, while I ask you to receive, The Petra my Sophia, THE ABOVE ONE IN THE SAME, she rightfully discerns mischief, that as was by certain past-keepers and translators upon not only the words of Matthew but as well upon any and all mass promulgation of what else said holy, divine or sacred of writ. Whereas, consider her proclaiming the writs how unto suffering mischief, as by (with pertaining to such writings rewritten and interpreted by false heads desiring to be “Rocks [Rocks: The Almighty chosen delivers and interpreters of His divine plan], how defined, of such persons, as if completed in one way or another. For, such persons, if who as were even seeking power, worse than who called “the lost”. And if who following from heresy, they are who of or as the lost, who rather truly not called of The Almighty who ignorantly or shamefully having kept the messages, letters and odes of The Almighty “ even so,\ erring was, scribes as wicked vipers. And thus, as that they have led, The Almightys communications were hindered – part of the mischief against the Petra and I.

But, of a truth, how returned to their original intent, it is as through their beginning, and such, NOT as prior to who the true Rock (a Petra -fem., the massive rock verses the Petros, mas., a small rock)“. And who looked toward The Rock, such was even Simeon Cephas, the disciple who was a Petros of the early church having knowledge of me and who as a female to be called to set the standard for the beginning of the awaited word – my gospel, THIS – Yodh, The Eye To Rejoice, her metaphorical child [Men were not of the divine plan given unto bringing forth a child, but who to be called Wisdom], where all holy writings shall exist as ONE, and where especially the communications of YHWH, those as were to the sons of Abraham, shall be fulfilled that I might be known as the expected Elijah (a Deity, her Yodh they did take as the seed and bring to revelation) who was predestined, by The Almighty, one with and as Him The Father, perfect and righteous in Glory, who even The Eternal-ones, ONE.

Now, look upon me, looking toward what below†’ two renderings of Matthew 11 €“ and consider the sacred text revealed by who I declare is the true and certain specified Petra – who should have remained awaited until now €“ same, my scribe who also having been called, of ancient days, Seshat, and associated with Isis, etc., and of course, of more recent past, SOPHIA, or The Kore (The Elect lady), but, even, €œthe scribe€ from, €œwhere is the scribe€, to, The Mother of The Book, and, even so, The Daughter of God, called, also, Zion as I. And note, of my two renderings of Matthew 11, whichever €œExpounding€, either, they both would to convey a message of no importance lest as with the word €œpropheteusav€ (prof-ate-u-sav) understood. For the truth among those of the knowledge, at the time of the message, surprise, it was to the taught-doctrine that when Elijah, a specific Elijah, came €“ the Elijah Elijah was named after €“ he would to be €œa desired created revelation€ of The Almighty€™s divine plan, what would to be set to be received. And through even changing hearts, and being sanctified with his children, raised from the dead, deified who having been called the son of man, the title the Elijah of Old having been honored as with for having believed upon him who would to prophesy long out as from the prophets€™ and the Torah€™s essence moreover toward being great of prophecy, and the prophecy, of him and the Petra

And John was compared to such a one, because like same, he had prophesied like the one to come. As, the one to come (the awaited since Adam, and moreover since the promise to Abraham) was moreover of the like of prophesying as John did, how to the practice of the office of prophesying as out from the revelations of sacred text that was not marked.

Now, receive this teaching, what leads to prophecy that is now being fulfilled. Study my two different renderings of Matthew 11:13, as through your awaited Petra rendering our straightforward truth, through, even, at times, mysticism. And to the renderings, one of them inferring the sacred writings themselves to have been, prior to John the Baptist, still with design for the Propheteusav (able yet to disclose prophecy) the other, inferring John the Baptist to have practiced the Propheteusav.

MATTHEW 11:13

1) Each, indeed the Prophets and the Law, till John (the time of him) (did) Propheteusav

A note to the above translation:

prof-ate-u-sav â†of action,did have the quality to prophesy

2) All for the Prophets (s) and the Law, far/how long John (didâ†’) Propheteusav.

Notes to the above translation:

Propheteusav, too, according to the discernment of the Petraâ†an action of labor minded toward seeking out the prophetic nature of divine writ, and even the addressing of needful prophetic disclosure, to thus, as by the unfolding of the written as prophecy, what as written, turned to a state of revelation.
how longâ†”continuously far
“Far and how long may be noted as a translation for the Greek word á¼•Ï‰Ï‚ – e.g. of confirmation seeâ†’ Luke 24:29, where, out of there – “¦and the day is farspent”¦

To reiterate and expound upon the two interpretations, above –

1) Each, indeed the Prophets and the Law, until John, Propheteusav (â†the message, how toâ†’ specifying, foremost, what was the nature of the writings of the Prophets, or the nature of the writ of the Law, until a certain time reached)

the sacred writingshad [past tense] that quality of prophesying (bearing witness of the woman and her seed), from out of the practice of the needful-discerning of the mystic, written communications of God that were yet defeated to, made of full revelation – for as they were, till the wicked vipers of John the Baptist’s time – what as were yet possessing secrets of prophecy all through their fiber.

2) All for the Prophets and the Law, far/how-long John Propheteusav (â†the messageâ†’ telling of a measure of time spent by John, with, announcing the written works contemplated by him for the discernment of specific prophecy)

John labored with all that was provided of God words, but mainly, the Prophets writings and the law, the Torah of the Old Testament, to bring forth prophecy.

The first rendering, number one (explaining further)Each, indeed the Prophets and the Law, until John, Propheteusa

it could be talking about all means “as voices towardtruth“, as were with those claiming to be sons of Abraham, that, they were of freedom of hear-ability or view-ability answering to or eluding to revelation pertinent to the Messiah and who the scribe, until John. And I say, that as because, even because of divine plan, that the message would to even go out unto the Gentiles, unto the Petra, and unto where it ultimately was destined coming back to the Jew to finish its work, for salvation comes through the Jews.

Yes, surprise, she who was prophesied to come, the Petra “ her work”what as, even, to rendering new testimony that ever was about the awaited Prince of Peace, even new testimony that was ever about the woman and her seed”(THE SEED [â†metaphoric] The Communication Of The Deity). Thus, to make witness, even, about herself, and too, as about her work, THIS, and , as even from all the holy writings as who, altogether, would be set a Deity (Eternal).

But, the Deity, of so being, to how come by €“ if first, it, what from €œa time of growth€ above ground, being like a flourishing tree, ultimately overcoming its enemies. And, but true too, same, as but prior to that flourishing, it as through €“ Stunted of Roots, made like unto restricted of roots, restricted of its natural underground growth, that but even purposed till but later (through the Eternal€™s intended design) fated nurtured by a certain Petra €“ the woman once prophesied to love me as like a sprout that, by her, its roots were not ignored or hindered. It with and of her, like as if in her womb, or in her garden for nine years, being watered, fed. And I, from such realization, contemplation and preparation, where above ground (Dec. 21, 2012), and as of there and where going, what of having had†’ a great foundation €“ rooted well that I like a tree, great, would to be, the Almighty willing, high (at the appointed time), mighty toward bringing not only shade upon the Earth, but even light €“ knowledge and righteousness toward eternal life.

And it has been as through my roots that were stunted, that, the masses did not know that this tree was of divine plan. But, the masses, able of knowing now, because, I have been cultivated, commenced by The Petra to put me into the light, as a light unto the world, and what would to evolve brighter.

My prior roots, what having turned into the darkness, God€™s words, many, having been bound, kept soiled, till I was divinely put to be discerned, of the light, and to rightfully redeem and, first, preach toward self for becoming The Prince of Peace overcoming the lies toward the Woman and the seed. Them, what, moreover, in scriptures as were, that of having been denied, by man, expounded upon.

But, now, know this €“ pertaining to testimony containing who €œthe Lesser of Regality€ in heaven (and relevant to this chapter of Matthew), let it be the Petra, though how as if a first time heard, but, heard, and known how, through even who was said to even boast of me and self, and how, like standing at the entrances of cities and crying out, my Goddess of crossroads.

Yes, with the above interpreted sentence, number one and by The Petra, complaining that the Hebrew writings and their teaching, of that time, were of the hindering of the knowledge of me and her. The scripture €“ what but even saying, €œthe obtaining or finding (Propheteusav) of such testimony particularly to being that about the woman (The metaphorical daughter, bride and goddess to God, to commence a foundation for truth) and her seed (The Tree of life, The Awaited Savior), in scripture for the seeing, such was halted at a certain time of John€™s and Christ€™s ministry€.

And, now, to again address the second version of interpretation, number two from above – All for the Prophets and the Law, far/how-long John Propheteusav€¦ it could be addressing, simply, a notation to the exceptional acts of John, that of his going far, as continuous (by utilizing the office of prophecy – the Propheteusav) with His message that once ever went out exposing the Prince of Peace and more – moreâ†’ “the woman and the seed”, effectively, and, also, particularly as to, the woman as, “the so called Queen of Heaven” – Sophia, same, Asherah, etc.

But, as even with The Petra being – SURPRISE – “the Lesser in Heaven’s regality”, herself – who not to be considered as while one as with God, if God as Love (Vishnu), her being who of any inadequacy.

And, now, as to John the Baptist of the prophetic office exposing The Prince of Peace, same what would to become the Son of Man, how as but same – “exposing the Lesser’s son, even, same, The Petra’s said husband (â†metaphoric) who, by divine plan, who but also, as what of evolving, and accordingly as from being a communication, for, not only the son of two vessels, two woman, but a glorification returning to the Glorified and Eternalâ†’ becoming one of and with the greatest and eternal who even the highest of communications – The Spirit, holy, and ONE. And even how so, as that – having loved the world as through, “returning with a message as an answer of grace, returning not void of fulfillment and of supplication to be one with who, for the sake of man, desired him forth the Petra”. Yes, “who returning not void”, as through willing to send what of him for a righteous sanctification, and thereby glorified.

It, the realization of required righteousness with the self for eternal life, for how, though by works, having given its discovered origin of pure spirit for becoming flesh unto the redemption, righteous, of man, was moreover glorified. Who sending whom to be humbled as it, representative for whomsoever in and submitted unto holiness, and that by grace, it became an everlasting Deity and savior, one with and as the Eternal. Yes, what was a communication of revelation that even became a revelation of flesh, a son – Jesus, the Christ, it did it for its communication’s glorification, but, moreover, for its own, IN. Yes, by the communication, through it for man’s hazing, righteous, unto redemption – a promise kept – salvation for the elect, even so for who came In, unto righteousness. And it was through same that it was, John, nearly perfect unto holiness, the greatest birthed of a woman was even saved.

And The Petra, herself, who of this scripture in focus, she is, of holiness and sin, who, below John, of who, of man, out of a woman, birthed on earth. Though, herself, how when as in heaven, as the truth of scripture bears forth, she is greater than John was of honor of birth on earth. Hold on, learn what you were denied from knowing, let this be a surprise learning, even surprising to – The Messiah coming through the glorified Communication of the Deity. And such not surprising, the surprise, because truth’s voices, those literally alive or not (from the flesh or written word) during Christ’s and John’s time (if the real message understood), they were hindered, and the Musterion strengthened. And it was strengthened even as by lies and avoidance of certain preaching, as that, the office of the Propheteusav and all of such observance were pulled back from giving revelations openly.

Yes, even John’s voice (via him or others) having been pulled back by Jesus Christ till He was risen, and the voices of truth, even then, as according to all things remaining the same, did continue to but still suffer violence to any of that truth revealed, till, of the knowledge, the Almighty willed it gained victoriously revealed of the seed of the woman.

[Note, also, the Israelite people once said that they would never stop honoring the Queen of Heaven, and you need wonder why, by sensible reason as not by how as that said of anyone, they were primitively stupid to believe there was a Queen of Heaven, while who, believing there was a King. Whereas, rather, do realize a truer understanding to the once and following response of God your eyes have been blinded toward, lest of prudence and wisdom in the word as like forth the Petra. Go in, back to the recorded, to reinterpret truth and not a lie]

Powers, unrighteous, they had begun at that time, during the expected time of the Messiah€™s arrival, thinking that he had not come, or, €¦to take His crown €“ planning their own salvation. And they did as thereafter seek a forcing of their way into the heavens, for a kingship there not of holiness, and did so, till Jesus Christ gained preeminence toward rule and was, for the sake of righteousness, who to be established a measuring line €“ the only sanctification from a round course of time. Yes, much you did not know, and much now you will need to begin to believe upon as through my Doctrine, that of The Petra.

And true, John and Jesus having taught on a Queen of Heaven – not the pagan sense, but an actual woman of the scriptures, those as even unraveled and opened up to a woman of paradox, who would be deified.  A woman who having been as if a queen to men, where of the south her honors, once, were of paradox with who, as by the thoughts of men, thought, rather, who would be holy as only who should have been the scripture€™s seed€™s procurer, same the woman, but, nevertheless, as who was, of man, less than holy, who was written about and discerned by John himself who having taught the prophesies of all the prophets, conveying €œthe blessed of title€ €“ the Lord€™s likened goddess and bride.

Yes, how to a great extent John did to reveal truth, of his ministry, from the writings of all the prophets, having expounded upon them, and too, upon the Torah, by the office of the revealing of the mysteries.  Doing so but correctly, having even prepared the way for Jesus Christ, as out from, when other€™s were not.   And, did so, openly, until Jesus€™s ministry advanced, and, to then, even by Jesus€™s desire to be rather but incognito, €œthat desire having been honored by John€, with, the woman and her seed back to being talked about only in unexplained riddle, etc., to all as unbelievers.

Indeed, as pertaining to the woman, many of €œher awaited discovered mysteries€ in the Law and of the prophets, during different seasons, they were defeated, as realized by scribes, teachers and prophets.   And, as of the Words of God, even now though much corrupted, they are still amid as the hidden, and how if exposed with and as the truth, as, what even but about her, and much moreover is about her seed, her son €“ the Elijah that would to come as her Lord to be set, who first of her, and revealing the hidden mysteries of where in and as this.  For, truth, of this chapter (Matthew 11), tells €“ €œtruth (knowledge) it was violated by the violent fearful of John€™s ministry and moreover the woman€™s to come.  For she would be, as with the seed, from out of her delivering it even as her ministry, who to establish, as providing a vision, €œthat an eternal regality in the Heavens would be righteously delegated€, and herself, who to be a catalyst of God€™s will done on earth, to, delegating and increasing its harvest how to €œrank€ (The Harvest: whom to leave for other worlds, even of the foremost, who to be granted eternal life with and as the righteous and deities, and to worship God in spirit).

Let her be no mystery any longer as who was and is talked about in my chapter, here of reference, and talked about as†’ €the Sophia (among many other names)€œ, the wise awaited of old [the Wise – it even her metaphorical son] – she who but ranked, as on Earth, €œthe lesser€  – Yes, the lesser, according to the status†’ a) Jesus Christ, b) John, and next, c) her, as on earth, but, otherwise†’ Jesus Christ, her, and next, John, as in Heaven.   As, her, when in heaven, only then as above John, as by respect and honor for mothering me as the Logos, who even prepared the way as I.  Though, if in me, during sanctification, then John and Her as but ONE , equally under.

For all the Prophets (†ALL: whom before and what was yet to come, even the greatest, €œthe Seed€]) and The Law (†The Torah/€the instruction€), how long (†a Greek word of €œcontinuance of place€) John (the Baptist) €œPropheteusav€ (†the past tense of Propheteuo prof-ate-yoo-o: Grk. €“ of a particular type of prophesying †’ I bear truth of meaning through which you might have a revelation †’ €œexercised the prophetic office€ : showed forth, displayed or heralded the mystic order whereof the sacred texts, thus, brought forth prophecy, and that prophecy, such as was about the woman and the seed, herself, whom €œthe lesser€, and to be one with Christ [as the chosen shall be], of the regality of heaven.

Others want to only translate the above sentence as if it were the Law and the prophets prophesying only up upon or until John, by translating €“ €œuntil€, instead of €œhow long€, but we know that is, as now by me, not true, lest what meant, else, that by the teachers, then, the writings of the prophets and the law were hindered/violated of their information from the Hebrew discernible as foretelling of €œthe lesser€, a woman, and her regality (the royalty position of the Queen of Heaven/who of the demeanor or dignity appropriate for a queen with her Lord).

But, wait, don€™t you know, the words of God cannot stop prophesying, unless they are tampered with so much so that everything of prophecy becomes a lie or is deleted.  And with such, to the case of the writings ending their Propheteusav, I do suspect mischief, and rather prefer wisdom; the sentence originally was, of doctrine, communicating both that John was doing the prophesying, and continuous, till even Jesus Christ desired not the extra attention, teaching clearly as from all the Law and all the prophets, in private.  But, even, the sentence preaching to whom as was violent, they were holding back the knowledge, knowingly or unknowingly,  concerning €œthe woman considered the Queen of Heaven, €œthe lesser€œ, Christ her HEAD€, her, €œChrist€™s church€™s head€.  And, who knowing, wanting for themselves power, all of it, specially in the heavens €“ seizing the information going forth about her.  For, acknowledging I do, the truer meaning of – Î’Î‘Î£Î™Î›Î•Î™Î‘:  (it is†’) reign, kingship, royalty, regality.  And, the feminine pronoun €œÎ‘Î¥Î¤Î—Î€, it is by mischief or poor and reckless translation, when only listed as €œit€.  What ending Matthew 12, rather is conveyable as €œHer€.   And I say so, as that, Mathew 11:12 says, or rather Jesus said

. –

Matthew 11:12

(The above, they rather all were of capital letters, and all, together.)

á¼€Ï€á½¸ Î´á½²

From morever/also

the days of John the Baptist until now,

Ï„á¿¶Î½ á¼¡Î¼ÎµÏá¿¶Î½ á¼¸Ï‰Î¬Î½Î½Î¿Ï… Ï„Î¿á¿¦ Î’Î±Ï€Ï„Î¹ÏƒÏ„Î¿á¿¦ á¼•Ï‰Ï‚ á¼„ÏÏ„Î¹

the (â†fem.) “REGALITY” (â†fem.)

of the Heavens,

she is seized,

Î²Î¹Î¬Î¶ÎµÏ„Î±Î¹

[A FEMALE ROYALTY â†’ Î²Î±ÏƒÎ¹Î»ÎµÎ¯Î±])

Of “Regality of the Heavens” â†a feminine connotation is worthy upon the word for Regality/Rule/Realm – how of writ and clause. And the knowledge to that fact: “the real doctrine of salvation blessed of the Eternal, is that anointed of the foremost person, who a woman and accredited Deified in the words of God from the prophets of old defeating the Musterion – and her, even now, defeating such for me”..

And I continue with Matthew 11:12 –

and violence (â†a noun)

pulls/plucks/takes away (seizes)

HER (â†fem..

[“took away”, as to, not noted of the holy texts and teachings]

A An example of a 3rd singular verb, middle/passive, such is: Î½Î¯Ï€Ï„ÎµÏ„Î±Î¹ – €She washes (middle€¦)€ or €œShe is washed (passive€¦)€. Note the ending €œETAI€ of Î²Î¹Î±Î¶ÎµÏ„Î±Î¹. Do source Basics of Biblical Greek page 221, and http://greek-language.com/grammar/22.html, etc. Find Î½Î¯Ï€Ï„ÎµÏ„Î±Î¹, of examples, either middle or passive.

And do consider, then, Î²Î¹Î±Î¶ÎµÏ„Î±i of Matthew 11:12, as applied toward €œa woman€™s (Queen€™s) regality, to thus, that Regality (†fem.), she is taken by force (The feminine nature of things is implied because of the fem. assignment of endings).

With revelation of the true doctrine €“  John knew the truth and He was preaching it, as by exercising the prophetic office how through the Musterion defeated by him and even by Jesus.  And, therefore, until he became largely effective with His voice, €œhe had been preaching freely toward the truth, the light (of no resistance from the enemy), but, even to assure that the truth didn€™t go missing altogether, refraining €œit€ from the-sold out-to-the-Romans and even from the blind, those loving the scribes and Pharisees then particularly willed toward robbing the inheritance of the one to come [the one to come – The Word of God/The Communication of the Deity]. In the Dark, they were who having been indoctrinated by wicked vipers (†who but not good €œvipers€ [Vipers were persons that had wisdom, good, bad or indifferent, in interpreting sacred and divine words from God]).

The Wicked vipers were driven toward bashing truth, and tempted, through seeking to control knowledge, changing truth.  Violating it, and how €“ €œseizing what about the woman who would bring €œthe seed€ €“ the deity to be set through her whom to be the accounted €œQueen of Heaven€ (even as, she was as so, by the words of God, of the prophets and the law), heaven€™s €œlesser one€ next to her Lord€™s Regality.  And, none the less, according to the word of God, greater of heaven than the earthly honorable John, least himself as her, one, literally in Jesus Christ glorified.

John, preaching, rightfully though, that even He would be of the Messiah €“ €œone with Him for sanctification. For, John said, pertaining to Jesus €“ €œThis One it is, as who after me, who (before) of me has been€¦.€ †precisely how John 1:27.  So why don€™t you ask for a honest explanation – €œHow was Jesus Christ, at some time prior, of/as †’ John€? Many read that passage by heresy of doctrine that by swayed translation fits a lie.   But, instead, know truth †’ John€™s submitted spirit was of Jesus Christ, IN HIM. As, the spirit in John, John€™s spirit, it was to be also (with the church who the lost to be found [for their spirits will be the retrieved from the grave, as unto sanctification into eternal life]) that of Jesus, with him (because he was of the elect), and was while even he looked on.

Yes, Jesus conveyed, as but after reminding that John had continuously (with the prophets€™ and the law, until John€™s ministry became a threat to the status-quo of the wicked so called vipers) taught people openly out from his defeating the Musterion (†the cryptic nature of the script of divine words, it having been devised by God for keeping whatever knowledge-to-be-known how but secret until or for when God willed it otherwise [others only making mistakes with trying to discern, failing at overcoming the Musterion.]), (teaching†’) that†’ €John, by knowledge, though of mystery then, He was Elijah.  That is, he was the real Elijah €“ though, of body, the body that was behead of that present time, He was not. And him as of the body that was beheaded, he was not the reincarnated Elijah that went up, but that of the real Elijah that came down and into Mary.

The Musterion, as with it defeated, whether of the Torah or of the writings of the Prophets, etc., brings messages €œabout heaven€™s regality€, that as by the command of God as what should be for revelation, through teaching by the practice that was carried out in the prophetic office (the Propheteusav) – €œdefeating the Musterion€. Which now I do, acknowledging the Musterion of need, defeated €“ €œthat€ as was, of being not defeated, what rather denied the people – by the scribes at the time of the awaited communication€™s communication as the son-of-man, the door into eternal life – a clear identifying of the Promise, the son of man, the son of the Deity.  Denied even as because the Musterion wasn€™t being defeated as much as it was being corrupted and to the bringing forth of lies €“ – €“ the growth, true, upon the words of God †’ €the harvesting and the gathering that had been secretively forbidden.

And Jesus continued to say (here, of Matthew 11) –

And if you are willing to receive he is “Elijah”

(Elijah †who they knew John and others had talked much about, as through the Propheteusav once practiced “ talked about as but a great prophet “ œthe Prince of Prince, the restorer, the Deity to be set “ the honored title for the prophet who even metaphoric as œthe seed. Elijah, a title, more so than what was a personal name for who was the prophet of old that was taken up. With, such is who they knew would come, œdoing the like as Elijah of Old “ rebuking heresy. Even so, all biblical characters, good, were named after who the Mighty Lord [†el. i. jah] to come “ such as “ Moses, Abraham, John, Thomas, Peter, as some examples [¦even the women were named after the Petra]. And, Elijah, who the same to Jesus, as, œmy Deity set [Eli.jah], as in that Elijah™s meaning, when appropriately broken down and discerned by wisdom [the last “hei” assumed], true, as those three words in Hebrew)

The above phrase “ œIf your are willing to received he is Elijah – it is the same as if saying (through setting up a scenario, a picture, a vision), for all tense and purposes – œhe could/he should be likened unto the meaning of Elijah . Elijah in Hebrew, how mystically understood†’ ¦he is†’ a God that came to pass/or ¦he is†’ my God, alasœ, /or, as with/of me (as above stated of spirit, but from after sanctified through me), œa deified, created revelation/or even, ¦he is†’ my Deity set¦. (NSCD; #410, #1931, #1934 [the “Hei” or “Aleph” are naturally assumed with the longer spelling in Hebrew, for Elijah]) (I remind, the Word of God says, that those truly of the Word of God, they are God™s, as, set to become the Children of The Most High).

John, also, as how or why likened unto Elijah “ as because – he preached by way of the Propheteusav.  John was as like (1. Elijah of old and (2. œthe Prophet that was prophesied to come [the Prophet who the actual meaning of Elijah], for he (John) was, as well, who came rebuking false doctrine and preaching truth, Himself like a repeat of the Elijah of Old, and a foreshadowing to the Prophet that both him and Elijah of old were like.  But John saying clearly that He was not Elijah, whether the one past, or the one to come. Clearly saying no to being (as born of Elizabeth)  who reincarnated from the Elijah that was the Prophet of old [reincarnation, certain aspects of it then being recognized, and Jesus Christ never having said, of a truth, that he was Elijah reincarnated], thus, making clear, if anything, he was not who having been taken-up into a chariot.

For the Elijah of old he was taken up as who no longer, from then on, to be of those going through reincarnation, having been lifted up to be with the Almighty who eternal. Nor was the Elijah of Old that Prophet (†a Seer) long desired to come, with too, nor was John that Prophet desired to come, for the book of John even said he was not œthe light of the world that many would believe upon, and first of doing so, when as if they were the only begotten son “ and surprise, indeed, when “ œthen but, of spirit (members of the body), one and the same.  Note: I did not say that he was not of Jesus Christ, nor not accounted unto righteousness as the Son of Man, even as Elijah was called.

It had been asked if he was œthe Prophet, and nothing was ever committed to that he was¦, and, I say, heresy would even be that that Prophet, the awaited, was understood solely as Mohammed or Joseph Smith, though understandably assumed, even as Elijah of Old is assumed.   And what perhaps was not assumed was that Elijah, of meaning, and the Prophet, œthey were one and the same when understanding both metaphorically.  Whereas, the hoped for Elijah rather (the light of the world, what to restore all things) was what the word Elijah as to name stood for, and, as œthe awaited one, come, what being of duty or purpose as but with the traits of a divinely called prophet or prophetess, interpreting mysteries themselves prophetic and direct from the word of God prophesying.  Yes, when, it/they would to come as who or what prophetically (which could be through revealing prophecy by the word of God) rebuking heresy, making clear, true doctrine.

No one, as to John, having properly asked the question, œWas he to be of/with that prophet, sent as a mere man, when it/he was to come to sanctify, when generated of water and or blood. [Water and Blood, also what metaphoric, as cryptic to the Hebrew letter œMem, and, surprise, what having been kept secret, symbolic of more than one œvessel(bride/wife) or œwomb], to which, John might have then said œyes.

And Jesus spoke about John as who was a foreshadowing of what to come, but too, pertaining to such to come†’ who did come, as, John was retained in Spirit, with what having come as œthe Deity to be set, so even as toward, crowned œa crowning accomplishment. Even, confirmed it should have been, John, not Elijah, because of the word œwilling that Jesus uses in this passage.

And if you are “willing” receive(â†liken â† in a passive way),

he is my God, alas”¦.

And if you are “willing” to receive (â†liken”¦.),

he is a Might/a Power that came to pass”¦.

And if you are “willing” to receive (â†liken”¦.),

he is my Deity set”¦

Note, ELIJAH’s meaning elaborated further , below

Continuing –

who should yet

(should yet â†Mello, of expectation – Grk) HAD NOT PRIOR COME IN SUCH FASHION!

come,

[Jesus emphasized, greatly, yet to come]

Do hear “ Jesus was also saying in riddle-code, by using the name Elijah (himself knowing all truth), that, as well, John one day would yet come as after death, as returned as one of the many, œthe many yet one, of Jesus Christ even from His one, eternal round, a course of existence. Which was to say, even too “ œJohn would be of the saints that would be in Jesus Christ. As through, first, one that goes to stand by with certain ones to be, of end, literally ONE with the Lord-God, as through His sanctification for them and others, to raise them to the level required to get into the Kingdom of heavens (a Kingdom of glories and realms of power). And, onward, of everlasting life, John, as in the Kingdom of heavens (the Kingdom or Regality¦.. attributed come even as because of the Petra, who the children of God deify, having fulfilled her calling), not in as the greatest born of the earth, solely of blood lines, but as†’ who was the example of what all else must surpass of righteousness, etc. For, any less of holiness and righteousness than that of John, then, whom as, œwhom not raised up into the Kingdom of heaven to abide, as not a through the promise. For, his, on earth, level of godliness, it was yet under the least amount of holiness required to get into heaven, that of eternal life. None there (of man) but, who as was one with Christ, born again, who no less than literally in and through Him, the worthy to become literally the greatest born of woman, even greater, that is, than John.

Note: 1) Who came to pass? (†of the Elijah translation of meaning) and 2) Who should yet come […should mello]? †Diffidently Jesus Christ.

Note: Seriously, who was the greatest born of a woman (if answer but not limited just to man™s generating), and, same, by comparison to those in the royalty of Heaven, who but as on Earth, lower than the least in heaven, Hum!, again, diffidently†’ Jesus Christ “ (Psalm 8:5) For thou hast made him a little lower than the angels¦.

Note: (to make a following point) It is scripture that tells “ œthe saved who go to heaven to be with Jesus will judge Angels “ Corinthians 6:3. So, If God is who being just in all things, something here needs to be understood correctly by revelation so the righteousness of God yet remains.

I say, œyou calling yourselves a believer, telling of self¦who toward judging angels, (if anything) not if you are less than John, which you are; and, I say, not even him judging angels, if, as in heaven, John, only as great as the greatest mere man born not of a virgin, him being as on Earth even less than all in heaven. So how then will the saints judge angels? There is an answer if you know the true doctrine, one by which God remains righteous in his delegations, and acceptances of judgments.

Note, also: John™s meaning of name – œthe gift of God, but moreover to be exact, The Yodh we did favor, and He will favor a œNUN (a fish, a faithful one) or as the Lexicon of New Strong™s Concise Dictionary (for Hebrew) would say, Jehovah revived.

Don™t you know something would need to make you greater than John the Baptist was on Earth, at a minimum as thus so to judge angels, even your righteousness need be greater than the Pharisees.

Suppose Truly, I say to you –

Not there has risen from WOMEN (plural) one greater than Jehovah Revived (our God [on a personal real level] returned to, or and as brought into fruition) to be what the true ablution is all about or through, THE ONCE AS WAS YET TO COME AS A POWER TO BE SET, THE CROWNED ACCOMPLISHMENT. And that Jehovah revived is and was and will be Jesus Christ who was born (hear true doctrine†’), but, even, as how generated, by WOMEN (plural) “ the Petra and Mary. Their son “ one aspect as, the Truth (even truth on how to be welcomed into the Kingdom of heaven, and at what levels of glory), and the other aspect, how but as, a Man as the Door into eternal life, and not just into the Kingdom or into the royalty of heaven or heavens.

Jesus was the meaning of John’s name, and, what was accredited to John was really what accredited to Jesus Christ. Of Earth, Jesus was not of the glory of the Father, though He was the greatest born of a Woman (Who even symbolically born of another vessel, a woman (the Petra) [as, himself, bothâ†’ Logos and Man (both toward glorified spirit)]). He was of authority but not glorified as “the Good One” while of earth until his mission was completed with His going up to the Father (the mystery to be revealed is who exactly (as a Deity) is the Father, but one thing for sure, God is, and God is of Spirit, and of essence, that of LOVE)[the only “GOOD ONE” is your Father in heaven, and surely His is who gave the sacred writings, as who last behind them for our salvation]. And only through Jesus, overcoming Satan, do we acquire status greater than the angels, or go back to who the Father. I continue, and REVIEW –

For

all the Prophets

and the Law (â†instruction),

how long (â†continuously Far!!!)

John “Propheteusav! (â†Propheteusav about what?

I dare say, who Elijah – “my God – Yah” [even the feminine Yodh])

And if you are willing, receive (â†of this “receive”, know to that

it is a passive Greek word […liken him/imagine]),

he is Elijah (â†Jesus Christ was setting up

a picture/a vision/a scenario)

â†“

He is

My God that came to pass (â†a meaning of Elijah)

My God, alas¦.

My Deity set.

(The Logos, indeed, it is a forerunner to Jesus Christ.)

Continuing with Matthew 11: 12- 19 –

He having ears to hear – let him hear.

Greater of wisdom than by œthe standard-understanding indoctrinated is how I want you to hear this – that Jesus was making a comparison of John to what needed to be mused upon, and that was œwho or what as was YET to come (the Logos, the other and greater forerunner to Jesus Christ), who, but even, had already come as, from a round course of time, Jesus Christ. As, that truth, it was what only receivable by those that had been paying attention to the cryptic truth that John, the prophets and the law discerned “ spoke about as from the Propheteusav (prophetic office) – it revealing the Wise one (the Petra) and, of a mystery, the Prophet (her Logos) expected.

But, I say, Jesus Christ acknowledged (while speaking with clever words, like of riddle), even though John was not the preached the œLight or the œTruthœ, if they were willing to liken John to Elijah, allowing Jesus to set up that vision of likeness, John did possess similarities of its mission, and would be of it ultimately through its salvation.

Even so, Elijah of Old, like John the Baptist, declared by cryptic-secrets of texts (through the prophetic office) – œwhat was to be the Christ, even as the Torah (as I do emphasize to enlighten) (etc.) did, does and will as well (through the Order of the Dove by the Petra). The Torah as especially how, now and in the time to come, by and as me the Petra™s metaphorical son.

And to the sacred writings “ they should be the Torah and the collective writings of the Prophets, etc. how as realized of revelation to be in the passage of Matthew 17: 12, as, as even, our Elijah, in that, œthey were what certain scribes did whatever toward as however they desired. Writings, victims to certain scribes who knew not or did not care that they (the Sacred) were as of the existence of the Mus·te·ri·on, of original form. Therefore, those scribes, even moreover translators, they were who having transgressed against the Law/the instruction, because of their lack of knowledge or care with or about such. Yes, many (not the sons of Abraham), followers like dumb sheep, followed the Scribes that originally restricted the texts with established marks/points (vowels), etc., therefore involved in, knowingly or not, the sin of œtaking away from¦.

Continuing –

But to what shall I compare this generation –

[This last statement, proof, Jesus just before, in speech, he was only making a comparison, even the reason why he said “if you are willing to receive (â†imagine), emphasizing a word subjective and passive, because it was a subjective and passive Greek word, similar to our English “receive”, but not perfect to it, and used more like, “do liken or “consider this, while nonchalantly next saying “He is Elijah”.]

Not to change the subject, but to comment on another verse in Matthew, also taught of heresy, what as a reply of Jesus, and totally about œthe Awaited One, El.i.jah [who the meaning of Elijah], but who wrongly thought/taught as†’ John, by those in heresy or in ignorance, as were the Apostle™s at times, I want you to know, same, where, and wrongly, Jesus is taught saying that John was Elijah, but, of truth, œHe did not. He truly never said that John the Baptist was the actual Elijah (either one) and neither did John, and I shall not put John in the category of preaching heresy, with, John denying such as well, as he did to say that he was not ELIJAH, and he knew what he was talking about. It is, as to Jesus, yes, where you have him in question saying¦, rather, obviously, he was speaking cryptic about Elijah, œthe awaited/who yet to come, who, same, œwhat would be a Prophet, metaphorically, as, not a man, then, but a seed, and even seed – metaphoric, to spring forth a righteousness to the nations.

Jesus ever remaining secretive in public until ears were ready to hear clearly about His inferences to whom often by riddle connoted and more. The age then was not able to even imagine how Truth (the sacred writings, pure) would to be, one day, a Savior not just in written form “ The Carried Out of faith by those that believed upon a name of what was same†’ The Word Made Flesh.

Thus, to –

Matthew 17:10-13 –

And His disciples questioned Him, saying, Why then do the scribes say that Elijah must come first? 11. And answering, Jesus said to them, Elijah indeed comes first and shall restore all things. 12. But I say to you, Elijah(God, her Yodh, or, my God, their revelation/a window/who to be a man to rejoice- YHWH™s communicating [†what the Petra renders as a meaning upon Elijah]) has already come, and not they knew him, but did in him whatever they desired – So, also (by marks [†what the Petra renders]) the Son of man is about to suffer by them.  13. Then (†on this word, Ï„ÏŒÏ„Îµ, it is where many stumble) “  the disciples understood that He spoke to them about John the Baptist.
Of  the œ13th verse “ DO NOTE “ if truly conveying the word Ï„ÏŒÏ„Îµ that has been translated simply as the English word for œthen, then therefore, know, respectfully a more perfect meaning is: œat that time (in relation, best [of consequence], to the subject matter “ the apostles how then relating).  The Apostles even with that statement from Jesus (Elijah has already come), they were yet to see the light complete, they knew it only then in part “ the message Jesus was speaking was broader than John the Baptist in particular, even in that, John the Baptist did not restore all things. Why are some so easily falsely indoctrinated, when its obvious, all things have not been restored? Don™t try so hard to make a lie truth, as by stubbornness so self to be said of insight or to validate what comes forth of King James, etc.

See, Jesus as if saying – œnow that I™m making comparisons [John not the actual Elijah], I™ll continue¦   œBut to what shall I compare this generation.

Continuing –

It (that generation)

is like unto children

[not the Petra’s children, but Jesus’s, as to then, and John’s, as to then]

in markets sitting and calling

[not like on phones or Internet, but what should have been effective-worthy, same]

to the mates of them, and saying,

We piped to you, and not you did dance;

[putting the truth in the arts]

We mourned to you, and not you did wail.

[they made supplications, they approached the subject from all angles, but the unbelievers could not be reached]

An indirect inference is being implied by Jesus Christ, about the dancing, heralding, mourning and crying, the things that will go on with my Children/His children, of this age, with their means of communicating that will be effective, but that somehow was not effective with that generation.

Next, He speaks straight forward to confirm who came to them suffering that truth be told, and, following, he speaks of who came rejoicing (himself) – who they also didn€™t receive.

Continuing –

For –

(point #1)

John (â†the one to mourn for)

came neither eating nor drinking (Jesus making His point),

and they say, a demon he has.

[They “ œthe hopeless of that generation, regardless of what anyone did, no one good enough, extravagant enough or likable enough for them]

(point #2)

[œNow, on the other hand, or, œeven, yet still, Jesus implying with His tone, same as if saying, œeven, too, so we tried a different approachœ.]

Came The Son of Man eating and drinking,

and they say, behold, a man gluttonous and a wine-drinker,

of tax-collectors a friend, and of sinners.
.

That generation didn™t even receive what a latter generation will receive, when The Son of Man is known and revered of who was their awaited Sophia (œthe wise), the woman they knew of old as who was prophesied to come of the latter days with the œseed, becoming even one with the seed as even by faith, and who having been a paradox unto herself “ holy, and yet, one to have eaten and to have partaken of the wines, a friend to sinners, etc.

The Prophet having been expected to come, but mostly over looked as the Petra™s Logos and who under it believing œIN it. Who as in, ultimately and symbolically The Petra™s and Its children, those to receive it, the Logos come by her who went by, once, Sophia on a stage of two poles. And, of revelation come forth of God, was known of old, of the pagan, connecting her with poles, but, even, known by the Israelite, as by two poles (Asherah poles), those upon each side of an alter, for that of ceremony to what put upon it, what the Israelite of old represented her as by, a sacrifice, and worshiping her in error, as, worshiping her on œthe inappropriate, that which even was a reminder to God of the very thing that had become disgusting even to her.

Continuing –

Yet/And

was justified thee Sophia by the children of her?

[By frustrated tone, but of adamant proclamation, as if to say, “your reasoning is baffling”, as that, the Petra had, at different times, many of the traits of both of them, as, she was who to be a paradox – as an example, both a virgin and a whore [of the two extremes in her life], but yet, of end, received, both of God and man]

She who was the least of the three truth bearers, least, on one hand, having lived a holy life or having been popular [least a social lite, least liked] when she conceived truth to tell, but, who had been holy, though once a sinner, and who had been liked, though even not liked “ who to acquire it truly said about her, œwho a paradox, who went into poverty, as eventually having left her atmosphere of being around certain sinners, and because of poverty went back to being around certain sinners, even having loved them, but nonetheless, who to repent and be justified of those ultimately coming in. She, same, who for part of her life was not a friend unto tax collectors and of another part of her life, their friend, because she chose not to incorporate me into the state.

Jesus was throwing their particular fussiness in there faces,

and, nonetheless, testifying to what they would not be able to stop,

the eventually acceptance of what coming

via the commission of who shall be Sophia.

____________________________

John– Who outwardly was the holiest of men with restrictive judgments upon self, to, should have been respected and received by so many more although his ideas about the Messiah, which was his knowledge how of the Musterion defeated as by him (a return to the knowledge of old, as directly from the revealed word of God), seemed so radical. Should have been received, too, although even radical, his dedication to solitude, in pray to God in the wilderness, eating what did avail itself, which to those who had not gone in search for the truth on their own, knowing of such, saw such dedication, thought of from a mad man. But, certainly not, as rather one, found of favor, who had had encounters, possibly visitations with aspects or entities of the Elohim, even with the eternal God, as with the unknowable, that is, as through the instruction of the Elohim, or as by meditation, pure.
Jesus Christ/The Son of Man– Who became The perfect Lamb (as why – man™s path for initiation into eternal life, toward deified with the Elohim). Same, what/who from the Elohim, and back to god again (the Elohim, God [ONE and mighty, as with and as God])(God: what found out, as, even all types of communication, all energy, mostly a universal conscience [a mind], throughout, as are all things. But, who of the knowing, the Elohim, nearest to the highest, whom having been able to see themselves as ONE with God, whom knowing themselves as a communication, even as but able of that but of glory, knowledge, righteousness, peace and joy). Who desired back to God, as having been His/their word, His/their grace, His/their salvation plan, to, as through, as His/their messages to man, for becoming a work, even of a biological communication (for an initiation purpose), the only one for man. Yes, whether as a Logos, or such, as a certain mere man as but not mere of spirit, an image of/for the Elohim as who as ONE of a spirit realm (that spirit realm: œan invisible to man™s eyes, communication realm). The Elohim, themselves, of God and as God, in, of, as, œa glorified Communication, to, whether visible or not. Jesus Christ: first, and last, of construction – given by such†’ by the god-communication, of and as what both invisible and visible. The first, toward perfect spirit, even in form, direct from what moreover was and is who God, holy. Who, as when by plan, but a mere man, though who as did but seem a moderate toward perfection of holiness, knew true holiness, having kept the laws/or instructions perfect, as, truly having understood it by his righteous godly given spirit, and having fulfilled it for others, so, who as the Perfect Lamb, for them, themselves to follow who had gone, of completion, first hand and perfectly. Yes, so, who following, as through grace unto the assured victory as by the cross. As needed, even as with, as in Jesus Christ, born again, specifically.
The Petra- Who has been a sinner, a woman of shame, paradoxical to be who œcalled. But.
The Petra– Who has been a sinner, a woman of shame, paradoxical to be who œcalled. But, still, who same†’was¦, and was repentant. Chosen, even in that, œwho having had a God given righteousness “ wisdom, righteously, to die for a friend who was willing to, as making a way for her righteousness unto all, die for her and hers “ who her savior. Herself since a child, by child like faith, having believed Jesus Christ her savior, and of her woman-hood, sensing untrue doctrine, having seen the unrighteousness of any doctrine, as understood, to place that Jesus direct and holy from God (from God almighty and glorious of peach, joy and righteousness) as from the Elohim, in a position to totally, with no righteous stipulation, die for her, a sinner. As just by†’ œher receiving of that doctrine, and thus, to become one of the Eternal, a god? God forbid, she said, and surely not; the unworthy would become what all should not take lightly “ eternal gods. And while looking closer at the Word of God to truly see why Jesus was sent for her, her faith to where, ultimately received of her Children (those that would to believe in this her doctrine, and even in me, symbolically like unto a father, as, symbolically, only now, one with her by our name together, and, surely, her oneness with me, as of†’ her faith in me).

The children of the Petra, who even shall be the remnant of the Jews to be in me (as after all the Gentiles to be grafted œin, into the priest hood of eternal life [this doctrine, the sacred words of God, moreover]) who the Christ, Jesus, Yodh, The Eye To Rejoice. In me as even when the word, the Elohim™s divine salvation plan made flesh, harboring them. And, accordingly, with all the like “ Hindu, Muslim, Christian, Mormon, etc., whom to be those of titles dissolved, and into this of clarity, through who first of righteousness, in, THE MOTHER OF THE BOOK. That book, the LOGOS “ the Petra and who the true Elijah, who the word of God calls, of itself, my shinning Moon.

Elijah ××œ×™×”×• “ also meaning: MY GOD TO BE or HAVE or My God came to pass [an ending œhei/hey (Hebrew letter œH, of breath) is assumed] “ Note, whereas to, œcame to passœ, what must mean an aspect of God, of image, as what came to pass as like you did and same, all things material. As, even as certain things of God come to pass everyday, how simply of life born or generated “ Him being in all, of all, and through all, as scripture tells. Hum, then, could it be, God, also through man? Therefore, the secret of Elijah, of the meaning of the name, it was and is an aspect of God that shall and has come to pass . And I dare say, Elijah, of meaning, as to who/what expected, same was mystically referred to as œthe Mouth of the Spirit of God, or œThe Hand..

IIn ancient writing, The hand: it was the Egyptian D [depicted as a hand], but the same depiction in Hebrew, it is the Yodh letter, and, the œY, in Hieroglyphics, two reeds or two features. But, it has been purposed, in translations, that the Hebrew œY was for the Egyptian œI, and that œI to me, as one reed/one feather “ the Truth of Maat, or even, but with the Hebrew œY, the two reed/features of hieroglyphics, they are the twin aspect of me, both word and lamb.

ELIJAH as who represents the name™s meaning, it/he is who œTHE LAST PROPHET TO COME BY WAY OF THIS EARTH “ for, do know truth, any others, forward after him, if to be called into the ministry of a prophet, then, who rather one with Him “ even as Mohammad is of that redemption plan divined of God. And the Petra says, I am that plan divined of God. For, even, I have two aspects “ one as the everlasting Gospel, THE ONE TO COME EXPLAINING AND REVEALING AND REBUKING, AND INVITING œIN (to be of two faces, as ONE [two websites, redundancy]), to, what as, when as with the Almighty™s POWER, becoming, in part, its other aspect (like of another face) – WHO OF THE FLESH, The Son of Man, as who not only is and shall be, but was..

THE DESIRE OF THE PROPHETS OF OLD, SHINES BEFORE YOU,

THE BEGINNING OF THE LOGOS

COME BY WAY OF WHO

SHALL BE KNOWN

OF THIS GENERATION,

AS OF GENERATIONS PAST,

ASâ†’ SOPHIA,

BUT EVEN MADELEINE,

“MY MOTHER OF NOSTALGIA”

WHO MY SCRIBE, SAID “THE WISE”

ONE WITH ME

AS EVEN OF HER

BY-FAITH-GOD-GIVEN-NAME –

“GABRIEL TITAN” -TO BE OF STRENGTH,

MIGHTY OF GREATNESS.

MATTHEW 11: 12 -19 – Sophia, The One Having Been A Paradox, SheIs The One You Will Receive, For She Leads To Eternal Life As Through Jesus Christ.

PLEASE DONATE

MATTHEW 11:13

Matthew 11:12

Search

Recent Posts

Categories

MATTHEW 11: 12 -19 – Sophia, The One Having Been A Paradox, SheIs The One You Will Receive, For She Leads To Eternal Life As Through Jesus Christ.

PLEASE DONATE

MATTHEW 11:13

Matthew 11:12

Search

Recent Posts

Categories

Tags